f.art

Waxing Waning Ideas

dav

because we need black and white categories and clear boundaries of great and sucks, here is a suggestion never take a position especially if you are investing in some ideas

Advertisements
Standard

I saw a few curious pieces in the past week, all related to recognition, and there was a bunch of updates on my LinkedIn network around awards nominations and appreciations.

First my favorite from abstrusegoose

Second Kerala government claiming Chief Minister’s office and the government are independent and have pretty much nominated themselves for a UN award

Third Monsanto sponsors an award and gives away the award to their own CTO with total disregard to the purpose of the award around food security and none of Monsanto’s work ever came close to achieving even 1% of the outcomes.

Of course nobody other than the losers pay attention to the selection criteria, objectivity and data collection methods. Pity…

cognoise, f.art

Recognition, Awards and Selection idiosyncrasies

Image
metaidea

Idea Selection

When I met with a customer exhibiting innovation capacities, she had this interesting perspective, I am quoting

“The power of an idea when run through our well oiled, efficient, process oriented delivery line, loses its potency and sometimes even its own relevance.How can we reduce the probability of this happening? Would it be possible to provide advisory services on developing an approach that will address this issue? Additionally can we develop convergence criteria for the ideas”

 This brings forth several different points,

one – when people talk about innovation it is mostly incremental in nature and the metaphor of the assembly line is prevalent even in the cutting edge financial services companies (case in point) If the process of development is that efficient you don’t need humans anymore.

 two – while the so called innovation facilitators (including yours truly) are great in coming out with numerous ideas within a short span of time, I am not clear about the convergence methods or idea selection itself.

 That said I have had some success in designing people centric short listing (facilitation methods post ideation) but the fundamental problem still remains.

 How does open innovation where ideas are even larger in number address this?

 Convergence criteria as I see a trend today is mostly directed from business who seek specific ROI proof, worked elsewhere type of inputs based on which they EVALUATE to pick ideas than really build on a crazy idea that will possibly be the next BIG thing this is not incremental this is breakthrough.

 Your ideas though in plenty and free solicited…

Standard