
because we need black and white categories and clear boundaries of great and sucks, here is a suggestion never take a position especially if you are investing in some ideas
because we need black and white categories and clear boundaries of great and sucks, here is a suggestion never take a position especially if you are investing in some ideas
Most people are familiar with innovators dilemma and innovators solution…here is my theoretical conceptual contribution with every innovator’s fantasy.
There are at least 3 grades to every idea socially, good ones and the seemingly good ones are obvious, and the final grade is just good to be seen with…sometime they bite you back especially when they succeed or fail spectacularly…
Don’t do anything today if it can be done tomorrow
Don’t do it, if someone else can do it better…claim that you can do better things especially when those better things are not needed
Don’t do simple tasks, while it is cheap and efficient… Start trying only after it gets dynamic, complicated, costly and inefficient
Don’t try doing anything alone…and coordinate with at least two busy others, around when/where/how to do, till everyone gives up trying, even to coordinate
Start with principle 1 on the new task, and claim expertise in multi-tasking
Addendum: there was a sixth principle in contention that all above 5 principles work only with tasks that have a compelling reason/objective/vision for gen-z. from my experience reasons are immaterial ab initio.
Empowered here specifically means do whatever in the name of innovation with no support given as money, manpower, useful quick decisions, etc…, and if it does accomplish anything meaningful that is worthy of a press release, sponsor will come pose for a photo with the innovator and talk about the same fantasies and mention ideas that are actively being developed to make the fantasies more real…
Closely related to the idea of innovation as a skill to sell old ideas to older people…especially if they have a budget and some fantasy