This is an often touched thread in my field of work; the thread of transparency in organizations.
When we deploy closed systems people ask questions around
How can I make this system open to a large number of people so knowledge sharing/discussion can happen?
When we deploy open systems people ask questions around
How can I make this system closed to a limited number of people so we can have our relevant (read private) conversations?
The platform/system will depend on the current popularity and someplace where they have no presence usually. Features, need for user functionality discussions tend to take back seat while we finish conclusively on the open/closed argument (mostly never happens in a single sitting mind you, as people want to bounce ideas internally “closed”).
Just because I CAN be more open does not mean I will be open. Why do people tend to have this warped reasoning when it comes to open information has always intrigued me, here are some
1. Fear of being misunderstood by a large number of unknown people
This fear is real, I have tried convincing people to write about a specific viewpoint that they so clearly articulate in 1 on 1 meetings, but they never had the courage to put it down on paper. This could also be a problem of language (in articulation and being unambiguous)
2. Fear of hijack of a personal idea by anyone of the large number of unknown people
If I am about to mobilize resources on an idea, I have to convey the idea as clearly as possible and if I am in a leverage mode I will have to leave room for idea building, trimming, refinement or even a change in direction. If I am that possessive about the private idea, I will cut a cd, open a bank locker and put it in, possibly throw the key in deep sea. No need to discuss further and selection of platform does not arise.
3. Hesitation to deal with the plausibly large amount of feedback that can come
Let us get real, any open information system is rampant with lurkers, 1 in 100 comment and take conversations further. This is a one reason why non-text entry user actions like “like”, “RT”, “Share” have come up.
If someone had to say something meaningful on a thread, I am all ears, I should probably bring him on board because he cared to respond.
4. Confidence/Arrogance that ideas from the select group is the best possible (both in time (best ever) and space (best on earth))
No need to discuss further and selection of platform does not arise here as well.
May be I am oversimplifying openness/transparency, what do you think? Think openly please.