Tagged with social media

Politics on the Intranet

Politics happens in the media covering mandates, parties, policies, power and all the rest of it. Power to control resources (money, people, time) for a limited period is the “Whats in it for me” (WIIFM) for a player. Media has a different set of WIIFM that may be for advocacy, publicity, subscription or other altruistic objectives. The players’ WIIFM are not the same as media’s WIIFM, but they use each other for good or bad and information becomes free and plenty. But they never ignore or act aloof of each other.

The same thing does not happen inside the enterprise, where there is no dearth of politics or the media which is your intranet with all its openness.
1. An ignored intranet is not a great place to do advocacy,
2. a completely closed set of html pages showing policies is not a great place to tell a viewpoint on why change is needed,
3. Leaders don’t logon to the intranet,
4. and information is in closed circles specifically information that is used to control resources.

Litmus test for an intranet is thus “does your organizational politics happen there openly, and does it impact decisions?”. If no value is there, there is no politics. Conversely presence of politics is evidence of value.

Tagged , , , ,

3 point social media strategy

I see several parallels between what is happening in the web versus what is happening within an intranet on social media. Example, What the brands are doing about consumer behavior is what functions/management should do about employee behavior within the enterprise, however then that’s just one aspect. While it takes much longer for enterprises to catch up with the available open internet technologies, fundamentally designing a social media strategy can be done in a technology agnostic manner.

I call it in cliché terms the ‘Connections > Conversations > Engagement’ or the E=MC2 strategy

Engagement equals My actions on Connections and Conversations

Connections are made, at multiple levels of abstraction. Several types of connections are possible such as a person to person connect or between a person and a brand.

All connections have one thing in common, connection are made in a specific space.

Physical proximity is a key factor in making connections, people don’t look for the perfect or the most relevant connection, they just go with what is the closest even if less relevant. After all it is only 6 degrees of separation between any of us, Milgram proved it before we were born

Virtual Spaces is next, with multiple channels opened up and each with its own level of information noise.

How clearly and loudly can you hear your audience speak about you in a virtual space, be it the bulletin board or on twitter?

If your people are more connected via SMS it might make sense to build a mobile phone directory than deploying a content management system.

Identities play a key role in connections, while it is easy to connect with people who have multiple matching identity facets.

Have you heard of the social objects, these take background center stage and necessary for connect to happen.

Connections trigger conversations (and spam)

Context to the conversation is what my social media presence does for me, if I am a brand and all I have is a badly packaged shoddy product.

I may hide my brand behind any social media and all I will end up getting is firing from every connection.

On the other hand you have a small but staunch following on your product and you intend to hear all the voices from this following, your strategy is to be all ears to any comment on a convenient platform, preferably where your users already are registered.

Building trust through conversations is based on honesty and just being who you are.

Being prepared to have the nasty conversation in open is an option, but to ignore it is not.

(Note to Self: While expressing thoughts and viewpoints it must be noted that downright honesty and first person content gets far more responses than preachy second or third person passages.)

Conversations when acted result in engagement

It is not enough to be conversing in the social media, it is plain necessary to act on feedback and respond in surprisingly delightful ways to the followers. I exist only because of them and I see no better way to improving myself than through this conversation. Trending follower needs through conversations and seeking active feedback is hard work, there are thankfully many tools and methods.

So, What is your social media strategy?

Tagged , , , ,

H1 2009 Round Up

Here is a 2009 first half year round up. Not much as I see it, but I could still be happy that I am a great filter.

Marketing

A great pitch will look like this when built with popular social objects, in this case Hugh‘s cartoon base.
Also of note is the Grabowski ratio in action M/E costs.

CoP

  • Within the CoP context I think desigining such spaces will energize and commit more people to the cause of knowledge. It is better and possible to design spaces for social interactions in your current context than blabber about knowledge eco-systems in ppts. Thanks to Kim for the hat tip.
  • In addition to Stephen P. Borgatti and Jos´e-Luis Molina paper , Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations
    this post will help kick start action in SNA if you are thinking of conducting one. Thanks to Graham Durant Law.
  • Interesting interpretations on network types and underlying SNA Methods. Great example on how easily we can misread a network diagram from Connectedness.
  • Though many people adopt NPS for analysing customer satisfacion scores longitudinally, I am seeing NPS in the context of communities for the first time
  • As unusual as it can get, community based km at SAP

Social Media Examples

Narrative

  • We have been hearing stories get you jobs, make people change, spend more, trust more etc, here is a nice example from an eBay sale.
  • The classic story archetype of J Campbell more movies this summer and the next and the next, you never get bored it is that good an archetype.

Is there any another way to allow people make sense than by narratives so variations can fit to context?

Knowledge Representation

I have this fetish for information visualization and flowing data has been my primary solace, here is Fusion Tables from Google. This I think is a direct take on ManyEyes from IBM.

Random KM

Yeah I hear this big picture missing thing a lot.
  • From Dave Snowden, lists facets on opportunity scenarios in recession times. I need to apply trends and its system evolution laws for articulating the opportunities within an industry. I have been using STC (Stands for Size, Time and Cost) from the TRIZ toolkit for quite a while now and it is very powerful for scenario thinking.
  • In a way organizational knowledge base system is very similar to these online giving markets. Giving part means the existence of trust both by the giver and taker.
    Great pointers on the success elements for such a market. 
Tagged , , , , , ,